+1 to that
Am 29.07.19, 10:43 schrieb "Dmitriy Pavlov" <[email protected]>: Disclaimer: it is only my understanding of posts on the Spark list: we should not name Apache Training as primary/sole/leading/official source of information about a project (in this case Apache Spark). It is a reasonable point itself, but I'm not sure it is a blocker for accepting the content. The second point says that there is some (better) source of material related to the project, but again, having something complete outside, should not stop us from accepting another material. Who knows, maybe accepted training with a couple of slides today will be developed and became the best information source later. пн, 29 июл. 2019 г. в 11:00, Lars Francke <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > I asked on the Spark dev list for support in reviewing the Spark training > material from TRAINING-17. > > Sean Owen has some concerns[1] about whether it is a good idea to accept > this material at all. As I don't understand all his points yet I'll refrain > from summarizing them to not misrepresent him. > > This might be interesting for others to read (or join in) as well. > > Cheers, > Lars > > [1] < > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4346abb4bac74d52c4bb3e3c7c264a84db831eb0fc053774373e2d47@%3Cdev.spark.apache.org%3E > > >
