Hi Lars,

I think perhaps a more relaxed approach would be ok: 
- CTR for content modules as this simplifies new contributions
- RTC for core modules such as the presentation framework, themes and stuff 
used by presentations.

I would also suggest to sort of have a lazy consensus on the reviews for the 
RTC cause this might prevent decisions being postponed too long.

Chris

Am 30.09.19, 15:25 schrieb "Lars Francke" <[email protected]>:

    Hi everyone,
    
    it was great meeting some of you at ApacheCon NA and I look forward to
    meeting a few more in Berlin.
    
    I've been approached again with the complaint that contributions to the
    Training project are too hard due to the review requirements. How about we
    change that then?
    I don't feel as strongly about this anymore as I initially did and I don't
    want to cause any harm or make anyone feel unwelcome.
    
    I'm still a fan of RTC instead of CTR because I've seen the Review not
    happen too often in the latter model but this is something we can always
    change again if we feel the need for it.
    
    If anyone wants to start a vote on this I'd be happy to +1 it. I've been
    very absent these last two months but starting in mid-October I hope to
    have more time again.
    
    Cheers,
    Lars
    

Reply via email to