Hi Guatam, It's not that simple: you do task A & B and PMC elects you as a committer. And, it is not so common to ask for comittership (even worse insisting on that). Let me share a couple of links, it may help to understand history, culture and the process. https://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#meritocracy
http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html Each community decides which contributions are enough to be elected. Apache Training does not have any additional guidelines yet. So, answering initial questions, you chouse any tasks you interested in and you find helpful for users and other contributors. Later, someone from PMC suggests a new committer based on recognition of merit, and if everyone agrees on this, a new committer is invited. This kind of personal discussion is always done on privately-archived lists, so potential candidate never knows when it happens, and usually is surprised with the invitation. Hi Folks, please correct me if I'm wrong and the incubator polding process is slightly different. Is IPMC in charge of discussion-vote, or PPMC suggests, IPMC approves, or PPMC decides it independently? Sincerely, Dmitriy Pavlov чт, 31 окт. 2019 г. в 04:25, gautam gupta <[email protected]>: > Hi, > Thanks Justin for clarifying it. I'd also like to become a committer for > this project. It sounds quite exciting. > > Could you please point me to the tasks that I should perform, to become a > committer for Apache Training? > > best regards, > Gautam > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:12 PM Justin Mclean <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > This looks great now! Is it ok if I can add a brief intro about myself > > on this page? > > > > While it's not made explicitly clear on that page, team = PPMC / > > committers of the project. So once you become a committer there’s no > issue. > > > > Thanks, > > Justin >
