As I said: I'm fine with your proposal. I just wanted to bring it up as going with the "standard" (even though it might not be the best option) can often be helpful but I understand your reasoning.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 10:27 AM Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, > > but "main" also lets the question come up: What's on "main"? > > Is this the develop branch or where releases go? > > Ok ... probably by looking at the branch list you could find out, but I > personally prefer "develop" for development and "release" for releases. > > Chris > > Am 18.08.20, 10:12 schrieb "Lars Francke" <[email protected]>: > > I'm also fine with changing it and I'm fine with whatever the person > who > does the work decides. > > The only thing I'd like to mention is that I believe Github uses > "main" as > the new "master" so people will come to expect that as the new default > but > I don't really care either way. > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 8:58 AM Justin Mclean < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > +1 to changing it. > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > > >
