Hey, thanks for all this work!  This looks really useful, and the
PLC4X skin is really quite nice too. It's really appropriate for the
kind of content we'll be serving.

I'm currently on vacation for a couple of weeks (until the end of
April) -- it's great to see things progressing in the meantime, and I
will definitely help review and polish when I get back.

One thing I'd be interested in working on is the recent Mamoto
(analytics server) that INFRA has put in place.  (Although I'm not
claiming this task if anyone does it before me! :D )

Best regards, Ryan

On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 11:52 AM Christofer Dutz
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> So, it took me slightly longer than expected to get things working .. in the 
> end it was just me copying stuff around and missing one directory the content 
> needed to be located under :-/
>
> So now we have one more module:
> website-skin
>
> If you build this with enabled integration tests:
>
> mvn clean install -P with-its
>
> (And yes: I intentionally said "clean" and "install" as if we don't clean, it 
> will not completely run the generation in the integration-test)
>
> It will also build our website using this new skin ... for that I copied the 
> current state of our website into the "it" directory. I also adjusted it 
> slightly to work with the new skin. So you have something where everyone can 
> experiment with and doesn't have to fear breaking our website.
>
> As mentioned before the "site.vm" and "site-macros.vm" are the templates for 
> producing html and the css files for styling it.
>
> As soon as we're done with this, we simply update the settings for the "site" 
> module and our website should look just like we want it to.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christofer Dutz <[email protected]>
> Sent: Donnerstag, 7. April 2022 10:33
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Anyone willing to polish our website?
>
> Hi Alexis,
>
> turns out there seem to have been changes in newer versions ... I think I 
> need to fix the plc4x website skin first as this too doesn't seem to work in 
> current versions :-/
>
> Chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexis TADIFO <[email protected]>
> Sent: Mittwoch, 6. April 2022 18:38
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Anyone willing to polish our website?
>
> Nice.
> I will contribute starting tomorrow.
> Well done.
>
> Le mer. 6 avr. 2022 11 h 42 a.m., Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> 
> a écrit :
>
> > Hi Alexis,
> >
> > I could simply duplicate, what I did for plc4x and setup the build to
> > use that custom skin instead ... for a short period of time things
> > would look a bit odd ... but that could be a starting point for anyone
> > to contribute by working on the site-skin.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alexis TADIFO <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 6. April 2022 16:13
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Anyone willing to polish our website?
> >
> > Nice.
> > How can I join this task ?
> > Regards.
> >
> > *Alexis TADIFO*
> >
> > *Software engineer - IT Consultant*
> >
> > Ingénieur de conception en informatique
> > 📞 (+237) 697 991 590 📞(+1) 418 569 8877
> >
> >
> > Le mer. 6 avr. 2022 à 05:11, Christofer Dutz
> > <[email protected]> a écrit :
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I just noticed that our website is not pulling the right image and
> > > link for the next ApacheCon so I guess we should fix this asap.
> > >
> > > Personally, I would recommend that I duplicate what I did for the
> > > Apache PLC4X project, and we create our own Site Skin that we can
> > > customize as we see fit.
> > > But I would need someone or some people to make it pretty for our
> > > project here.
> > >
> > > Here's the module I built in PLC4X:
> > > https://github.com/apache/plc4x-build-tools/tree/develop/plc4x-site-
> > > sk
> > > in
> > >
> > > I think not manually creating a website in another language has the
> > > nice benefit of not having to learn another framework, and it's
> > > super easy to have our website automatically built and deployed by 
> > > Jenkins.
> > > But I'm happy with any option you folks come up with ... as long as
> > > they actually finish the job and not just start it ;-)
> > >
> > > What are your thoughts on this?
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to