Hi, As we have solved all category-x problem, we could rename the package name of TsFile to org.apache.tsfile, then do the first release.
Jialin Qiao Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> 于2024年1月4日周四 21:10写道： > > I think that’s ok this way … > Chris > > Von: Yuan Tian <[email protected]> > Datum: Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2024 um 13:16 > An: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: First release version of TsFile > Hi all, > > I've already submitted a pr(https://github.com/apache/tsfile/pull/1) to > tsfile repo which removed two dependency `io.airlift.slice` and > `org.openjdk.jol.jol-core` which are with GPL 2 licenses. > > > Best regards, > ------------------------ > Yuan Tian > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:05 PM Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > And we should replace the category-x dependency before trying to release > > anything. > > > > So I would suggest to keep the code in IoTDB until we have released TsFile > > … as soon as that’s done we can migrate IoTDB to use that released version. > > > > Chris > > > > Von: Yuan Tian <[email protected]> > > Datum: Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2024 um 08:23 > > An: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > Betreff: Re: First release version of TsFile > > Hi, > > > > I think that we keep the old version `0x03` will be better which means that > > previous tsfile generated by IoTDB needn't be changed. > > > > Best regards, > > -------------------------- > > Yuan Tian > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 11:26 AM Jialin Qiao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > As current version of TsFile is used in IoTDB 0.12, 0.13, 1.x, we > > > could set the first release version of TsFile 1.0.0. > > > Local alteration of TsFile should always compatible with old version, > > > so we could keep the major version 1.x.x as long as possible. > > > > > > Note: The version number in tsfile header is 000003. We could change > > > it to 000001, the 000001 and 000002 are only used before IoTDB 0.11, > > > which is nolonger maintained. What do you think? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jialin Qiao > > > > >
