Hi Chris, I think we can take Object Store as another file system, and actually we've already implemented it in timechodb, so I think we can simply renamed it.
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8:49 PM Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> wrote: > Well for these it’s not just renaming them … they are currently not part > of the TsFile project. > They would need to be moved here in that case. > > Chris > > Von: Yuan Tian <[email protected]> > Datum: Freitag, 5. Januar 2024 um 13:46 > An: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: Some things I came across while renaming the packages > Hi all, > > private String objectStorageFile = > "org.apache.iotdb.os.fileSystem.OSFile"; > > private String objectStorageTsFileInput = > "org.apache.iotdb.os.fileSystem.OSTsFileInput"; > > private String objectStorageTsFileOutput = > "org.apache.iotdb.os.fileSystem.OSTsFileOutput"; > > these fields are used in Object Store, I think it's ok to rename them. > > > Best regards, > ---------------------------- > Yuan Tian > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8:22 PM Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > here are some questions that came up during my renaming of the packages. > > > > > > * Which of the Patents in the NOTICE file apply to TsFile? > > * Should the IOTDBLZ4Compressor be renamed? > > * TSFileConfig is using “iotdb-common.properties” I guess this should > > probably be renamed too, right? > > * TSFileConfig seems to reference some IoTDB types in string > constants > > > > So far that was all that I noticed. > > > > Chris > > >
