Hi Justin, Yes, substantive discussions should indeed take place on the mailing list. The biweekly gatherings are not formal meetings and are not the recommended approach for in-depth discussions.
During the first quarter, there was an extensive exchange of ideas regarding the infrastructure setup and the division of TsFile code from IoTDB, which resulted in a significant increase in traffic. At present, the TsFile (Java) project, is in a relatively stable status. There is no immediate need to alter its architecture, as doing so could lead to compatibility issues with the systems that rely on it. Our primary focus is on the exploration of new programming languages for the TsFile project, such as C/C++. I will also encourage contributors to put more discussions on the list. Jialin Qiao Justin Mclean <[email protected]> 于2024年5月7日周二 14:11写道： > > Hi, > > In your report, you state that the project is "Ongoing with high activity." > However, I don't see much conversation in your mailing list. I also see > mention of biweekly meetings, but only one has been documented on the mailing > list. Were there any other meetings in the last quarter, or did you forget to > post their details to the mailing list? Remember, all decisions must be made > on the mailing lists. The report also mentions a significant drop in list > traffic, why has this occurred? > > Kind Regards, > Justin
