Hi Yiheng, I agree that it helps we standardize the commit title. Actually the ZooKeeper community use
ZOOKEEPER-XXX: (optional components) PR description And thus I use TUBEMQ-7: Using StringBuilder instead of StringBuffer in BaseResult I'm ok with your proposal but what's important IMO is document the decision both, at least, on 1. TubeMQ wiki page 2. CONTRIBUTE.md in repo (optional) 3. PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE in GitHub so that we notify our contributors once they try to submit a pull request. Best, tison. Yiheng Wang <yihe...@gmail.com> 于2020年1月8日周三 上午11:38写道： > Hi community > > I've noticed that PR titles are little causal. For example: > > - optimization for delete unnecessary code > - TUBEMQ-7: Using StringBuilder instead of StringBuffer in BaseResult > > Should we consider follow common Apache project pattern, like: > [TUBEMQ-XXX] PR description > or > [TUBEMQ-XXX][Component] PR description > > Thanks > Yiheng >
