On 24.01.11 12:48, Ludwig Magnusson wrote: > I’d be glad to hear any comments on what Thomas said about what to do to > release M1 of tubine4. The biggest issue seems to be the scheduler. I could > merge in the old one if no one thinks it’s a bad idea.
Welcome from me again - for the public records. :-) The scheduler issue is more work than you might think. The previous scheduler implementations used to build on the JobEntry/BaseJobEntry as generated by Torque. This is no longer there and I'd rather keep it that way. JobEntry is now an interface. I suggest to merge the NonPersistent version if you will. Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
