On 24.01.11 21:09, Ludwig Magnusson wrote: > Anyway, I believe that I have it back to the way it was before and if you > want to look at it I can commit, but if you'd rather work on a new > implementation that's fine as well.
Well, I didn't want to introduce more Torque dependencies than necessary. However if we can agree that this would be for the milestone only, I am fine with your solution. A new implementation using quartz went south with my Macbook's hard disk a couple of months ago (No, no daily backups...). It was not finished anyway. Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
