I'd definetly welcome a poll. /Ludwig
From: Scott Eade [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: den 26 januari 2011 21:35 To: Turbine Developers List Subject: Re: Java version for fulcrum/turbine On 26/01/11 4:23 AM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > On 24.01.11 23:15, Scott Eade wrote: >> The Java version we compile against is certainly open to discussion. As >> a community developed project we would typically survey our users, but >> with a reasonably small number of developers we are more than likely to >> allow any one of us to peg this back due to the environment we are >> required to work with. So if all developers were using Java 6 we would >> probably open this discussion on the user list, but if even one of us is >> constrained to use 1.4 we will probably just stick with this. >> >> I believe Thomas is required to use 1.4 for now, though this is for him >> to confirm. For the record, I use 6. > No, not anymore, 1.6 is fine with me. AFAICT, other projects seem to > switch to 1.5 when giving up 1.4. Personally, I don't see much > difference between 1.5 and 1.6. YMMV Great. Probably the best thing to do next would be to conduct a poll on user@ checking on the minimum version in use in the wild. It is quite possible that others are constrained to 1.4 or 5. Scott --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] _____ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3404 - Release Date: 01/26/11
