Hi list, concerning upcoming releases of Turbine:
- Turbine parent release should be either done without voting or not - we still have not concluded IMO or have we? I think, it should be released this year to enable up-to-date releases (including current reference to Apache parent pom, ..). - The next Turbine RC is waiting for Torque 4.1 (which is not yet released), right? It should have the scheduler removed or replaced. What are the other goals for this release or the release after this? May be, we should make a clear cut and explicitely support only Java 8? If we decide to do so, the same should be true for the Fulcrum components to be consistent. Should we do it by allowing 1.x releases (Java 5) and 2.x (Java 8)? And Http/2-support is coming (in browsers is and in Java 9).. - Logging: Turbine Trunk had log4j as logging framework and has currently slf4j with default log4j, cft.http://www.slf4j.org/legacy.html. This should conform with Avalog default logging behaviour. May be logback would be even better instead of log4j (same for the Fulcrum components)? But log4j 2.x would be an alternative, too. I am happy with each one of them. Which way we should go? Best regards, Georg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
