ok, I reverted the (anyway still incomplete) service annotation 
processing. To illustrate, what I intended, a patch is included. It may be 
still incomplete or incorrect, but I think it would be possible at the 
end.

Best regards, Georg





Von:    Thomas Vandahl <[email protected]>
An:     Turbine Developers List <[email protected]>
Datum:  04.01.2018 18:41
Betreff:        Re: svn commit: r1819127 - in /turbine/core/trunk: ./ 
src/java/org/apache/turbine/modules/actions/ 
src/java/org/apache/turbine/om/security/ 
src/java/org/apache/turbine/services/ 
src/java/org/apache/turbine/services/security/ 
src/java/org/apache/turbine/util/



On 04.01.18 16:45, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> I thought as injectTurbineService just calls getService - which may be 
> called at any time later - we should be quite safe (?).

Yes, but getService initializes the service if not yet done so you may
end up in a endless recursion.

> But even if processing is done after the init call it is only the early 
> initialized services, which gets annotated and injections of other 
> services would remain indeed unresolved. I think, if we use hashset, 
which 
> gets updated for each injected service (name) this could be fixed 
(running 
> the annotations process recursively after the service init loop). 
Injected 
> Turbine service annotation could then be used in all methods, but not in 

> the init method itself and would require at least one early initialized 
> root service. 

Please keep in mind that the Turbine service layer can be extended by
other service providers, which would make this tracking next to
impossible. I already had a hard time to resolve the automatic
early-init of service provider classes. I'd rather go without this 
feature.

Bye, Thomas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Attachment: EarlyInitTurbineServicesAnnotated.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to