[x] +1 yes, start using gitbox in general, start the migration to a 
writeable git repo with one svn repo (turbine archetypes or another one), 
connect to github and check using more github features, use this feature 
optionally for more git repos, if needed.
[ ] 0 don't care
[ ] -1 no, because

-Georg



Von:    "Georg Kallidis" <[email protected]>
An:     "Turbine Developers List" <[email protected]>
Kopie:  [email protected]
Datum:  14.05.2018 11:47
Betreff:        [VOTE][GIT] Use (writable) gitbox, start with for Turbine 
Archetypes



Hi all, 

As I am in the process to get a GIT clone for Turbine webapp repo, cft. 
INFRA-16437 and reading the last comment 

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16437?focusedCommentId=16472623&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16472623


we might consider to migrate Turbine Webapp as a _writeable_ GIT repo to 
apache gitbox! (gitbox.apache.org = "GitHub Dual Master", not Git Wip, 
although only the latter is mentioned in 
https://www.apache.org/dev/writable-git). I think gitbox is just more 
git-centric, the release is done completely with git. Dind one example 
discussion here:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/infra-issues/201804.mbox/%3cjira.13152162.1523589032000.359092.1524717900...@atlassian.jira%3E



This is just implemented as a self service, i.e. we could do this ourself 
(at one point of time), but we are completely free to do it as we like it 
(IMO), even as a SVN backed GIT, cft. 
https://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache, which might not be the 
recommended way IMO.

I would suggest to start with cloning/importing (not the main project) 
just the svn repo

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/turbine/maven/archetypes to the gitbox as 

turbine-archetypes-git.

The GitHub - Connection could then be done at any time later as far as I 
can see. 

We may decide to do it before the next release to perform a git release 
(@Jeffery)? 

Before more time is wasted, I would like to do this as a vote (procedural 
type, i.e. majority vote would apply).

[ ] +1 yes, start using gitbox in general, start the migration to a 
writeable git repo with one svn repo (turbine archetypes or another one), 
connect to github and check using more github features, use this feature 
optionally for more git repos, if needed.
[ ] 0 don't care
[ ] -1 no, because.

If there are any further compatible/consistent suggestions and they match 
the general direction, I would just continue the process.

Thanks and...

Best regards, Georg


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to