My pleasure .... and I agree with marking the components. I was working hard to track down what matters, but then ultimately it was easier to just start updating everything :-)
And I haven't used the XMLRPC service since around 2003 when I had to talk to an old piece of software to deliver shipping labels. ha! I have no use for it now though. Happy to report I just migrated a fairly large app to the turbine-5.0 code base with pretty minimal effort. The main things to watch out for was to make sure all configuration was updated to commons-configuration2 and the changes to Part/FileItem I sent to the user list. Other than that, it seems to be working like a charm! I also just pushed another set of changes to github to update the mysql database driver to latest (8.0.12). The only real issue I ran into there was the additional parameter required for setting the serverTimezone - I made this a configuration on the archetype when setting up a new project (and set UTC as default). Finally, I am not sure how much work is involved to update to torque-4.1 (or when it will be released), but so far all is still working fine with torque-4.0 I was fortunate to have a couple days of downtime, so I dug back in. I was inspired again after attending ApacheCon NA last week. Even though my talk was not accepted, I did a lighting talk "Apache Turbine Isn't Dead" - I got some great comments after, but I did hear from a number of people that they thought it was dead :-/ If you want to watch my talk, it is posted here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTROCvmhXko My part starts around 16:55 -- Jeff On 10/04/2018 02:36 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > On 03.10.18 16:07, Jeffery Painter wrote: >> I figured my time was better spent making sure everything is working >> properly in jdk-8 first before attempting to get it working in java >> 9,10,11, etc. > Great stuff, Jeff. Thanks for taking the time. > > I guess we should define what the status of all the Fulcrum modules is > going to be. Some of them are plain dead (know someone who uses > XMLRPC?), others purposes are at least questionable (configuration, > cache). In Commons, components are put into the categories "proper", > "sandbox" and "dormant". I propose to establish something similar here. > > Bye, Thomas >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
