On 05.11.18 20:42, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > On 05.11.18 15:24, Georg Kallidis wrote: >> just another thought: Why not better migrate to log4j2 ? Does anyone >> object? This may be appropriate as we support per default servlet 3 now. >> >> If we do this, we have to remove usage of property/domconfigurator, but we >> get a (much) more flexible subsitution engine. > > +1, if we finally decide for *one* logging system. Right now, Turbine > has dependencies on log4j, commons-logging and slf4j. If it is log4j2 > (which I'd prefer because of own dogfood and such), so be it. But please > remove all the other stuff.
I forgot Avalon... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
