I'm ok either way, so +1 to drop the parent pom. On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 to drop the parent pom and add required declarations to sca/pom.xml. > > Thanks, > Raymond > From: ant elder > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 8:57 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: R1.3 update and call for help > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > <snip> > >> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm waiting >> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca pom. >> > > From previous discussion i wasn't sure everyone was in agreement we should > drop the parent pom so I was waiting to see if there were any comments from > those who'd already voted for releasing a new parent pom to see if everyone > is happy with dropping it now. Releasing a new parent now would delay the > 1.3 RC now as it would have to wait for the parent release votes, so in the > sake of expediency i'll do the changes this evening to drop the parent pom > unless any one shouts. > > ...ant > >
-- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
