[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1286.
------------------------------
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
I think this is fixed but if not please reopen. (and a testcase would be nice
:) )
> InterfaceContract is not correctly set for a component service if the
> component is implemented by a composite
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-1286
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1286
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java SCA Assembly Model
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
> Reporter: Raymond Feng
> Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
>
>
> Hi,
> I ran into an issue with the following assembly:
> ComponentA is implemented by Composite1. Composite1 defines a
> CompositeService Service1 which promotes ComponentB.Service1. Only
> Component.Service1 has a java interface defined.
> From the debugger, I observed that the CompositeUtil resolves the
> InterfaceContract in the sequence below:
> 1)
> ComponentA.Service1.setInterfaceContract(Composite1.Service1.getInterfaceContract());
>
> // At this moment, it's null
> 2)
> Composite1.Service1.setInterfaceContract(ComponentB.Service1.getInterfaceContract());
>
> // This is good for Composite1.Service1 but it doesn't pop up to
> ComponentA.Service1
> As a result, ComponentA.Service1 still has a null InterfaceContract.
> Thanks,
> Raymond
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
