[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12673022#action_12673022
]
Scott Kurz commented on TUSCANY-2845:
-------------------------------------
I wrote this up as an issue with the textXML wireFormat handling... but let's
look at the wireFormat.jmsObject handling... we can't throw FaultException in
that case either.
> Checked exceptions w/ default JMS wireFormat over <binding.jms> should
> serialize fault, not FaultException
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-2845
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2845
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java SCA JMS Binding Extension
> Reporter: Scott Kurz
>
> I realize the spec doesn't spell this out, but I think the most natural
> mapping to say, what we do in <binding.ws>
> would be to serialize the fault to XML and put it in a TextMessage, assuming
> that the other side can construct the appropriate
> exception from the fault.
> True this is very JAX-WS-ish, which a straight JMS programmer might not
> expect... but what else could we do, use java.lang.Exception somehow?
> Today the checked exc seems to result in the throwing of FaultException,
> which will only work if Tuscany is on both sides.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
