Having this extension implemented as binding extension gives us
possibility to expose SCA components as Erlang modules or message boxes.
I assumed that it wouldn't be possible with implementation extension.
Thanks,
Wojtek
Luciano Resende pisze:
I'll start with the disclaimer that I'm not an Erlang expert, but I
was wondering what is the user story when integrating SCA and Erlang.
Basically I'm trying to understand why we are taking the approach of
defining a Erlang binding, rather then creating an implementation type
which would probably allow users to expose a module function as an sca
service, and then use a binding (such as web services) to allow a
remote component to invoke the Erlang business logic.
Thoughts ?
