On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Simon Laws <simonsl...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, also isn't it the case that, as it's not actually checking what > the attachTo refers to, it could be throwing away the directly > attached policy when it's not required to do so? > Yes.. If there were two directly attached policy sets on one element and one happened to have an attachTo attribute that didn't match anything, the policy set without the attachTo attribute would be removed. Brent