On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:40 PM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Simon Nash <n...@apache.org> wrote: >> ant elder wrote: >>> >>> I've committed the TUSCANY-3698 fix from Padraig Myers to 2.x and will >>> to 1.x once i can get a build through, whats the status of 1.6.1? Is >>> it too late for that or can i merge this to the 1.6.1 branch? Its just >>> a change to the jms module code and a couple of itest updates for the >>> new message format so it should be harmless. >>> >>> ...ant >>> >>> >> I've been diverted from 1.6.1 for the last few days. I'll be able to get >> back to it later today and I'm hoping to create a first RC tomorrow. >> If that doesn't happen, my next opportunity will be next Tuesday as I'm >> away for a few days over the weekend. >> >> The TUSCANY-3698 fix sounds fairly low risk, but with any change there's >> a chance of problems. Are you able to run a full 1.6.1 build with the >> fix merged in and also re-run the JMS-related samples on 1.6.1 to make >> sure the fix doesn't cause any problems? If it passes these tests and >> can be merged in by the end of today, I should be able to pick it up for >> the first RC. >> >> Simon >> >> > > Ok I've committed it to 1.x trunk and have locall merged to 1.6.1 and > am presently testing that, taking a while to get a build through but > hope to let you know its all fine by later today. > > ...ant >
Looks ok to me so have committed to 1.6.1 branch in r1005108. ...ant
