On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Simon Laws <simonsl...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:31 PM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Whats the status of the compliance tests in trunk? I've managed to get
>> a build through all the way to the java-ci tests without failing which
>> is further than its got for ages, that fails with missing dependencies
>> and compile errors and looking at the pom.xml its still using the old
>> feature (which doesn't exist) not the base-runtime but updating to
>> that gets compile errors and looking in tuscany-otests-sca-j-ci-tests
>> it looks like its missing a lot of things. Has that got extra changes
>> that need to be published?
>>
>>  ...ant
>>
>
> Not as far as I know. I've getting a clean build at the moment. I see
> what you mean about the feature. I didn't spot that so I must be
> running of a version cached in my local repo. I'll change it here also
> and see what happens.
>
> Simon
>
> --
> Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
> Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
>

I committed an updated pom. Can you give that a spin and see what
happens for you before I fix the rest of them.

Simon

-- 
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com

Reply via email to