On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:20 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: >> I note that many of the itest poms now depend on the base-runtime jar. >> I recognize the need to test this jar if we're going to ship it but it >> makes development a bit of a pain, i.e. you have to re-build the jar >> to include any changes before you re-run the test. I've changed any >> tests I'm working on locally back to depend on the base-runtime pom. >> Is there a reason all the tests need to depend on the jar? >> >> Regards >> >> Simon >> > > I like the consistency of it over the overhead of the extra build step. > > ...ant > Why would it be inconsistent to use the pom? It should be (assuming maven did the right thing) the same dependencies.
Simon --- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
