On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:46 AM, ant elder <antel...@apache.org> wrote:
> > The main differences are that the testcase doesn't run Tuscany and the > Tuscany plugin isn't defined in the pom.xml. I think having a unit test that starts the Tuscany runtime has multiple benefits: - more helpful for the newbie user (he's actually seeing the runtime starting) - helps us keep track of the broken samples through Hudson Regarding the tuscany shell, I'm not sure which option I'd prefer for starting it (declaring the tuscany plugin and use it with maven or have the user set his path to the jar). I guess I'm fine with both.
