Debugging through the code it turns out the the current Tuscany implementation already supports both namespaces. There is a bunch of Tuscany code only for the old namespace but none of that appears to ever get used. I'm not sure how that will turn out as the OASIS conformance support gets done but for now i'll just leave it as is.
...ant On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Raymond Feng <enjoyj...@gmail.com> wrote: > For compatibility reason, can we have Tuscany handle both namespaces for now? > > Raymond Feng > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 24, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Mike Edwards <mike.edwards.inglen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 23/02/2011 13:13, ant elder wrote: >>> The current Tuscany<implementation.spring> code is still using the >>> old OSOA namespace for the sca extensions to the Spring context files. >>> As FYI I plan to update that shortly in trunk, which does mean any >>> existing sca spring applications would need updating if they're using >>> the SCA extensions. >>> >>> ...ant >>> >> +1 - this does need doing. >> >> I assume that this is a 2.x statement and that 1.x will remain unchanged? >> >> Do you need help with the 2.x changes? >> >> Yours, Mike. >
