[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-2723.
-------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

We've moved to replying on the working OASIS compliance tests now so we don't 
need this any more. 

> Updates to the processcomments.rb file
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-2723
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2723
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: Java SCA Verification Tests
>    Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.3
>            Reporter: Yiwen Huang
>            Assignee: Simon Laws
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: assembly_wiki_output.txt, javaapi_wiki_output.txt, 
> processcomments.patch, wsbinding_wiki_output.txt
>
>
> Hi,
> In this patch, I have attempted to add two new columns: OASISConformance & 
> OASISdivergance.
> For OASISConformance, it looks for "ASMXXXXX" (where "XXXXX" are numbers) in 
> the comments of each vtest method.  This indicates which OASIS conformance 
> item the method covers.
> For OASISdivergance, it is simply hard-coded to "yes" for the moment.  Once 
> we decide how we want to indicate if a vtest method diverges between OSOA and 
> OASIS specs.  We need to update processcomments.rb to parse the proper text.
> Another change I had to make is to add a "require 'date'" statement at the 
> beginning, in order to be able to run the processcomments.rb file.  Not sure 
> if it is due to a problem in my ruby enviornment (if it was working with the 
> statement before).  Based on my understanding of the ruby language, I think 
> it is safer to have the require statement, so I went ahead and added it.
> Please let me know if there is any questions or problems with the changes I 
> made, thanks!
> Best Regards,
> Yiwen

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to