[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13106085#comment-13106085
 ] 

Greg Dritschler commented on TUSCANY-3948:
------------------------------------------

The patch appears to cause a failure in compliance test POJO_8017.  I am 
investigating it.

> Support @Remotable on implementation class, reference field, or reference 
> setter method
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-3948
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3948
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0
>            Reporter: Greg Dritschler
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: TUSCANY-3948.patch
>
>
> The Java CAA spec says this about @Remotable:
> 3177 The @Remotable annotation has no attributes. When placed on a Java 
> service interface, it indicates that
> 3178 the interface is remotable. When placed on a Java service implementation 
> class, it indicates that all SCA
> 3179 service interfaces provided by the class (including the class itself, if 
> the class defines an SCA service
> 3180 interface) are remotable. When placed on a service reference, it 
> indicates that the interface for the
> 3181 reference is remotable.
> I tried using @Remotable in this way...
>     @Reference
>     @Remotable
>     public Service1 reference1;
> ... but it fails with a compile error:  annotation type not applicable to 
> this kind of declaration.
> The Remotable annotation class in Tuscany has @Target(TYPE).
> The spec says it is supposed to be @Target(TYPE,METHOD,FIELD,PARAMETER).
> I also notice that ReferenceProcessor doesn't have any code to deal with 
> Remotable.
> I also discovered that while ServiceProcessor tries to propagate @Remotable 
> on an implementation class to the service interfaces, it doesn't work because 
> it marks the interface remotable after introspection is done.  This doesn't 
> work because some introspectors behave differently for local vs remote 
> interfaces.
> I am submitting a patch to fix the above problems.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to