Hi, Before the changes, we use jabsorb as the jsonrpc 1.0 implementation. I decided to use a home grown for number of reasons:
1) The jsonrpc protocol is simple enough. I'm trying to avoid the dependency to a non-active 3rd party project 2) I'm trying to leverage Jackson to improve performance 3) I want to use JSONRPC 2.0 at some point for binding.sca remoting 4) I want to try gzip encoding for some situations Thanks, Raymond ________________________________________________________________ Raymond Feng rf...@apache.org Apache Software Foundation Member Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com ________________________________________________________________ On Oct 10, 2011, at 1:28 AM, Simon Laws wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:01 AM, <rf...@apache.org> wrote: >> Author: rfeng >> Date: Mon Oct 10 05:01:04 2011 >> New Revision: 1180780 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1180780&view=rev >> Log: >> Use home-grown JSONRPC implementation >> > ...snip > > Hi Raymond > > Just interested. What made you build a home grown version? Was is 2.0 > support that tipped the balance? > > Regards > > Simon > > -- > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
