[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13232631#comment-13232631
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-4024:
------------------------------------
I've fixed the place where the wireFormat elements get written so that the scdl
doesn't get validation failures. I can't recreate the issue with the
wireFormat.jmsObject getting written when it wasn't there in the original SCDL
so i wonder if that is coming from somewhere else outside of Tuscany? Can you
give any more info on how to recreate the problem?
> wireFormat element written in wrong place in the binding.jms response element
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-4024
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4024
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java SCA JMS Binding Extension
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0
> Environment: All OS
> Reporter: Vijai Kalathur
> Assignee: ant elder
>
> If I start out with a component like this
> <service name="InvokeServiceOasis">
> <binding.jms>
> <tuscany:wireFormat.jmsObject/>
> <activationSpec create="never" jndiName="jms/Oasis_JMS_AS"/>
> <response>
> <destination create="never"
> jndiName="jms/Oasis_JMS_Response" type="queue"/>
> <connectionFactory create="never"
> jndiName="jms/Oasis_JMS_CF"/>
> </response>
> </binding.jms>
> </service>
> after it goes through the composite build process, the resulting component
> looks like this:
> <service name="InvokeServiceOasis">
> <binding.jms>
> <tuscany:wireFormat.jmsObject/>
> <activationSpec create="never" jndiName="jms/Oasis_JMS_AS"/>
> <response>
> <destination create="never"
> jndiName="jms/Oasis_JMS_Response" type="queue"/>
> <connectionFactory create="never"
> jndiName="jms/Oasis_JMS_CF"/>
> <tuscany:wireFormat.jmsObject/>
> </response>
> </binding.jms>
> </service>
> I am not sure if there is a reason why we need to write
> <tuscany:wireFormat.jmsObject/> into the response element and if we do need
> to include it for some reason, it should be the first element under the
> response. This causes a validation failure currently.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
