Steffen Grund wrote: >> >> Especially getDisplayArgumentName() and getArgumentDescription() >> require some table to map the >> function name (aProgrammaticName) and the argument id (nArgument) to >> the argument name and description. > > No, you do not have to implement XAddIn. As far as I know, the AddIn > service is an older concept for providing the information that is now > stored in the CalcAddIns.xcu file. As Jürgen stated in a previous mail, > this has the advantage of not having to load the whole component for > accessing simple text information. > I do not have a link to an example for this, I am afraid. Perhaps > someone else can help here? > If you have used > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Calc/Add-In/CompleteAddIn > as a template, I fear that example should be updated.
That is new to me. I mush have missed the point where XAddIn is optional and, yes, I have followed that template + the SimpleCalcAddin (where the is an other subtle error to do with the linker). Things should get easier without this interface. I will try to remove it and report what happens. Andrea --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
