2010/4/4 Marshall Schor <[email protected]> > > +1. I think there is a (slowly?) growing interest in OSGi - see, for > instance, the latest info in the apache felix project [1] and in > particular, the newer, possibly unreleased subprojects [2]. There are > efforts there in the Apache Felix Commons subproject [3] to do more or > less what you are trying to do here - it would be good to confirm these > approaches are aligned :-).
2010/4/21 Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> > 2010/4/14 Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> > >> >> In my opinion we shouldn't advertise OSGi support since key features >> of UIMA cannot be used flawlessly in an OSGi environment right now. >> >> > Hi, > I would like to wait for new (parent) POMs as Marshall is working on them > and then put sandbox annotators bundles POMs with new "parents" inside a > separate project in the sandbox so that the community can start looking at > and using them. > Jorn, do you already have in mind which features could be difficult to use > in an OSGi environment and why? > Do you think we should wait before we get in touch with Felix Commons to > advertise our effort on OSGi? > Cheers. > Tommaso > I think it's time to have this work on the Sandbox so that we can "play" with it, without advertising OSGi support but starting to actually face issues (if any) ;-) What do you think? Cheers, Tommaso
