The vote passes:
Marshall Schor +1 Jörn Kottmann +1 Tommaso Teofili +1 No other votes were received. Although it hasn't been 72 hours, because release votes can't be vetoed, and because we've been examining these components carefully already (in previous votes, etc.), I'm going to go ahead and close this vote, and release this. Thanks to all who voted! -Marshall On 7/15/2010 10:33 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > The remaining build artifacts have been released in a series of 4 staged > releases, all to be voted on. > > This is the first release of these artifacts (version 1 was canceled). > > Jira's fixed: > > > Sub-task > > * [UIMA-1757 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1757>] - > use docbkx to create docbooks in place of current docbook tools > project > * [UIMA-1758 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1758>] - > remove dependency on checked-out other projects > * [UIMA-1759 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1759>] - > make project versioning more conventional > * [UIMA-1763 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1763>] - > Switch to using Nexus for releasing > > > Bug > > * [UIMA-1051 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1051>] - > doc build not working on Linux > * [UIMA-1805 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1805>] - > change aggregate for build projects version to follow version > convention for those > * [UIMA-1806 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1806>] - > fixes for releasing, in build poms > * [UIMA-1813 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1813>] - > aggregate parent pom build fails rat test > > > Improvement > > * [UIMA-1814 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1814>] - > Try making release:prepare work with all build projects by adding > in relative-path > > > Task > > * [UIMA-1755 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1755>] - > Improve Maven build > * [UIMA-1816 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1816>] - > update parent-pom-top references to version 2 > > > > The release is staged in 4 staging repositories: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-051 > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-008/ > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-010/ > > Suggested way to test: add this to your maven "settings" in the > <profiles> section: > > <profile> > <id>staged-release</id> > <repositories> > <repository> > <id>staged-release</id> > > <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-051/</url> > </repository> > <repository> > <id>staged-release2</id> > > <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-008/</url> > </repository> > <repository> > <id>staged-release3</id> > > <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-010/</url> > </repository> > <repository> > <id>staged-release4</id> > > <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-011/</url> > </repository> > </repositories> > <pluginRepositories> > <pluginRepository> > <id>staged-release-plugin</id> > > <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-051/</url> > </pluginRepository> > </pluginRepositories> > </profile> > > Note that all 4 staging repos are listed, and one is listed as a > pluginRepository, too, because its contents are referenced by some build > tooling. > > The trunk has already been updated to change references to these POMs to use > the > to-be-released version, ready for testing with these staging repositories, > when > you use the maven parameter -Pstaged-release to activate this profile. For > example: > > mvn install -Pstaged-release > > More background on this approach is here: > http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html > > Also, please inspect the release artifacts to insure they have the > proper license /notice files. > > Vote open for 72 hours. > > It would be very good to approve this quickly, because until the release > happens, other people may have errors when building (because they will refer > to > the to-be-released versions), unless they use the same "settings.xml" setup > described above. > > [ ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 > > Thanks for your help in checking/verifying, in advance! > > -Marshall Schor > > > >
