I do only need the "runtime" plugin (nothing else) since I am developing
plugins that only use uima-core. Other tools are just overhead for me.
Even saying that, I prefer to have (I don't know how difficult to do that):
 - runtime plug-in
 - tools plugins without "runtime" plugin (that will require the above
runtime plugin)

Tong

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I always tended to think that the tools probably have to include another
> copy of the runtime since UIMA does not play too nicely with OSGi. I never
> quite understood why I would want to install a "runtime" when I could
> actually run any AE from within Eclipse - mind that was before there was
> the launcher plugin (which I still have to try out).
>
> -- Richard
>
> Am 05.12.2011 um 20:27 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>
> > Well, my intent is to reduce confusion :-) So, I'm willing to change
> this.
> >
> > Can we hear from others re: what they feel is the least confusing way to
> label
> > these?
> >
> > -Marshall
> >
> > On 12/5/2011 2:15 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> >> On 12/5/11 4:30 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> >>> The reason it is named with (includes Runtime) is to create an
> expectation that
> >>> the user just has to check this box.  If we left off this phrase,
> users would
> >>> likely wonder if they had to also check the Runtime.
> >>>
> >>> However, as you've noticed, it "just works" - whether or not the user
> checks
> >>> UIMA Runtime, so in some sense, it doesn't really matter - other than
> to reduce
> >>> some potential uncertainty in some users.  I guess I'd like to keep it
> as it is,
> >>> for that reason.
> >>
> >> This is not an eclipse convention and I wonder if this really reduces
> >> uncertainty.
> >>
> >> I went to this site with the intention to install both the Runtime and
> Tools
> >> plugins, now it made
> >> me wonder for a moment if the Tools in some way include a different
> Runtime
> >> than the one above.
> >>
> >> I then tried both and the dependencies on the next page made it clear
> to me
> >> that it simply
> >> means that Tools has a dependency on Runtime which is automatically
> resolved
> >> for me,
> >> since that is just expected behavior such a note can also be confusing.
> >>
> >> Jörn
> >>
>
> Richard Eckart de Castilho
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Richard Eckart de Castilho
> Technical Lead
> Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab
> FB 20 Computer Science Department
> Technische Universität Darmstadt
> Hochschulstr. 10, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany
> phone [+49] (0)6151 16-7477, fax -5455, room S2/02/B117
> [email protected]
> www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de
> Web Research at TU Darmstadt (WeRC) www.werc.tu-darmstadt.de
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to