On 1/25/2013 9:27 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > On 25.01.2013 14:40, Peter Klügl wrote: >> On 25.01.2013 14:02, Jörn Kottmann wrote: >>> On 01/25/2013 01:13 PM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>> If I undestand that correctly, then I have to remove ANTLR and htmlparser >>>> from the NOTICE/LICENSE in the top level project since they are both not >>>> part of the source release. Then, I have to add NOTICE/LICENSE files (with >>>> ANTLR and htmlparser) to src/main/readme/ in the top level project and to >>>> the uimaj-ep-textmarker-engine project since those two binaries will >>>> contain the third party libraries. The other plugins also need their own >>>> NOTICE/LICENSE files in src/main/readme/ since they contain the icons. Is >>>> that correct? Is there a shortcut, something that influences maven what to >>>> put in those files, or which file to copy? >>> >>> +1, sounds good. >> >> Unfortunately, this did not work. I added individual LICENSE/NOTICE files to >> src/main/readme in uimaj-ep-textmarker-engine but the binary just contains >> the default files and additionally files with ".txt" extension and the same >> content. The -sources jar contains also only the default files. >> >> Any ideas? >> > > Can someone verify that the information in [1] is correct? I am searching for > an example with similar preconditions and correct LICENSE/NOTICE files. If I > take a look at the latest official release of the SDK, then I can see the > LICENSE/NOTICE files of the top project, e.g., with the mention of the icons. > However, the plugin org.apache.uima.caseditor_2.4.0 has only the default > LICENSE/NOTICE files in its META-INF folder (no mention of the icons). The > LICENSE/NOTICE files in src/main/readme (top level) contain the information > about the icons.
Right. When you get your packaging fixed, I think we'll need to change this project too. You're the first one pioneering this :-) -Marshall > > Peter > > [1] http://uima.apache.org/maven-design.html#LICENSE%20and%20NOTICE%20files > >> Peter >> >> >> >>> >>> Jörn > >
