+1 for ID for feature structures as well. On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Neal Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes. It currently isn't inline with OASIS spec, but this is something that > we're preparing to suggest as an extension. I'm trying to get generic > feedback from the community right now as to how / what this could look > like. We have some documentation that we'll be sending out for it. > > > > On 02/04/2013 02:21 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: >> >> 2013/2/3 Richard Eckart de Castilho >> <[email protected]> >> >>> Am 01.02.2013 um 00:33 schrieb Neal R Lewis <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> As for the identification of CASes and objects within, I would like to >>> >>> push the idea of a Feature Structure ID, as I've written about before. >>> Were there any other thoughts / suggestions about such an object? >>> >>> I think an ID for feature structures would be good for the CAS in >>> general. >>> Do you suggest to extend the UIMA FeatureStructure to contain an ID? >>> >> If I recall correctly that's been discussed a number of times, I'd be >> personally in favor of such a thing but I wonder how that'd relate with >> the >> OASIS UIMA spec, would that break the spec? >> >> Tommaso >> >> >> >> >>> -- Richard >>> >>> -- >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Richard Eckart de Castilho >>> Technical Lead >>> Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab (UKP-TUD) >>> FB 20 Computer Science Department >>> Technische Universität Darmstadt >>> Hochschulstr. 10, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany >>> phone [+49] (0)6151 16-7477, fax -5455, room S2/02/B117 >>> [email protected] >>> www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de >>> Web Research at TU Darmstadt (WeRC) www.werc.tu-darmstadt.de >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >
-- Renaud Richardet Blue Brain Project PhD candidate EPFL Station 15 CH-1015 Lausanne phone: +41-78-675-9501 http://people.epfl.ch/renaud.richardet
