On 08.02.2013 15:03, Marshall Schor wrote:
In the source-release.zip, the LICENSE file has a defective copy of the creative
commons license, in that the sub-headings (e.g. "a", "b",...) are missing.
These are used (referred to) by the license, so they have to be there :-).
An example of reference:
If You create a Derivative Work, upon notice
from any Licensor You must, to the extent practicable, remove from the
Derivative Work any credit as required by clause 4(b), as requested.
But there is no (b) under "4".
These are in the original license pointed to by the url.
When fixing this, please check other places where this might have been copied
incorrectly; I only looked here...
fixed.
I will prepare another RC.
Peter
-Marshall
On 2/6/2013 10:33 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
the fourth release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA TextMarker is
ready for voting. This vote also includes our new composite repository.
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-204/
SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/textmarker/tags/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4
Composite repository with three update sites: uimaj, uima-as and
textmarker-2.0.0:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/eclipse-update-site
Archive with all sources:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/source/textmarker-2.0.0-source-release.zip
Binary distributions:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/dist/
The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages.
They can also be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
ONLY FOR REVIEWING:
Documentation (pdf file):
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/tools.textmarker.book.pdf
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks.
Peter
