On 14.05.2013 00:47, Marshall Schor wrote: > The page http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html > says that creative commons attribution licensed things can be included in > apache > distributions, but it links to version 2.5 of that. > The icons we include link to version 3.0 of that: > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ > > I've asked on legal-discuss if this is OK and if the legal/resolved.html web > page should be updated. > > I don't think this will be an issue...
First, I linked to version 2.5, but then I needed a plain text version and only found an official one for 3.0. The hompage of the icons say, that both version can be used. Let's see what legal-discuss says... Peter > -Marshall > > On 5/7/2013 7:12 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> the second release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA Ruta >> v2.0.1 is ready for voting. >> >> Changes in RC2 vs RC1: >> - updated composite repository is provided >> - small bug fixed: UIMA-2875 >> >> Staging repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-015/ >> >> SVN tag: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/ruta/tags/ruta-2.0.1-rc2 >> >> Composite repository: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/eclipse-update-site >> >> Archive with all sources: >> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.0.1-rc2/ruta-2.0.1-source-release.zip >> >> The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html. >> They can also be found here: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.1ruta%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >> >> ONLY FOR REVIEWING: >> >> Single eclipse update site >> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.0.1-rc2/ruta-2.0.1 >> >> Documentation (pdf file): >> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.0.1-rc2/tools.ruta.book.pdf >> >> >> Please vote on release: >> >> [ ] +1 OK to release >> [ ] 0 Don't care >> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ... >> >> Thanks. >> >> Peter >>
