[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13711167#comment-13711167
 ] 

Peter Klügl commented on UIMA-3071:
-----------------------------------

I think there must be a third (and fourth) symbol for breaking up the sequntial 
matching, because the semantic of & is too near to |. It would not make much 
sense to use & in a context other then "both need to be true at this position". 
Looking for more ideas how to express this functionality...
                
> Break up sequential matching in Ruta rules
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-3071
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3071
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: ruta
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.2ruta
>            Reporter: Peter Klügl
>            Assignee: Peter Klügl
>             Fix For: 2.0.2ruta
>
>
> Break up sequential matching in Ruta rules: Right now a list of rule elements 
> specify a sequential pattern. In some use cases, however, the sequence of 
> annoations is not as important as the their existence. An example: A rule 
> should fire, if some complex annotations patterns occur within a sentence 
> whereas the location or order is not important. Two use cases can be 
> distinghuished: "and" and "or". A disjunctive matcher is already implemented, 
> but only suppport simple matching conditions, but not complex patterns (e.g., 
> additional conditions) for the alternatives. I am still thinking about the 
> best syntax for this. Right now, my favorite is a special character that 
> separates the rule elements. An example:
> {noformat}
> BLOCK(b) Sentence{}{
>   CW PERIOD & SW COLON;
> }
> {noformat}
> ... a sentence that contains a capitalized word followed by a period AND a 
> small written word followed by a colon, regardless of where they occur in the 
> sentence.
> Maybe also something like the follwoing is then possible:
> {noformat}
> NUM (CW{REGEXP("A") -> MARK(NUMA,1,2)} | CW{REGEXP("B") -> MARK(NUMB,1,2)});
> {noformat}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to