Is there any reason why do work with excludes on the sandbox and include
all svn management folders (tags, branches trunk) instead of just mirroring
trunk? 

I'd somehow have a more cozy feeling without things being excluded.

-- Richard

On 18.11.2013, at 20:27, Richard Eckart de Castilho <[email protected]> wrote:

> Could that be "uima-uimafit" or simply "uimafit"?
> 
> -- Richard
> 
> On 18.11.2013, at 17:08, Jens Grivolla <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hello, if there are no objections, I will file a ticket for the following on 
>> INFRA:
>> 
>>> We would like to have a git mirror of the Apache UIMA SVN. As the project 
>>> has many submodules with individual trunk/branches/tags structure we would 
>>> like the following mapping:
>>> 
>>> uimaj                       uima-core.git
>>> uimacpp             uima-cpp.git
>>> uima-as             uima-as.git (ignore uima-as/depend-on-parent-pom-4)
>>> addons              uima-addons.git
>>> sandbox             uima-sandbox.git (ignore 
>>> sandbox/{ruta,uima-ducc,uimafit})
>>> sandbox/ruta                uima-ruta.git
>>> sandbox/uima-ducc   uima-ducc.git
>>> sandbox/uimafit     uima-fit
>>> site                        uima-site
>>> build                       uima-build (ignore build/archive)
>>> ignore eclipse-packagings
>>> 
>>> All of these follow the standard SVN layout.
>> 
>> Comments?
>> 
>> Jens
>> 
>> 
>> On 11/15/2013 01:02 PM, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>>> Ok, AFAICS due to the project structure we would actually need a
>>> separate mirror for each sub-project (uimaj, uimacpp, uima-as,
>>> uima-addons, uima-sandbox, ...)
>>> 
>>> Also, some sub-projects don't purely follow the trunk,tags,branches
>>> structure, such as sandbox which additionally contains other
>>> sub-projects (uimafit, ruta, ...) which have their own
>>> trunk,tags,branches structure. These would probably need to have their
>>> own independent mirrors outside of uima-sandbox.
>>> 
>>> I have no idea how to deal with eclipse-packagings, and uima-as has an
>>> additional depend-on-parent-pom-4 at the top level that seems weird.
>>> 
>>> Any comments?
>>> 
>>> Jens
>>> 
>>> On 11/15/2013 12:50 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
>>>> On 11/15/2013 12:20 PM, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>>>>> Ok, so who can do it? Does it need to come from the PMC?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> You can just go ahead and do it.
>>>> 
>>>> Jörn

Reply via email to