Great work, Peter! I've reopened the Jira, and am fixing this, for those projects which specified the required execution environment.
The ones that didn't specify this (the debug, jcasgen, launcher, and pear packager) don't have any Java 7 dependencies, so I didn't change those. -Marshall On 1/17/2015 12:04 PM, Peter Klügl wrote: > Hi, > > I don't have a good feeling if we do not enforce the java version for the > plugins since the shipped implementation requires at least that specific > version. This could lead to nasty errors the user have no clue what caused > them. > > I started the testing in development mode. All worked fine. > > Then, I built the updatesite and installed the plugins in a new Kepler, but I > uncommented Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment since I think that we really > should include this. This resulted of course in the problems you reported. > > Instead of testing it without Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment , I looked > for the source of the problem and found that we simply specified a wrong > version. We need to use > > <Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment>JavaSE-1.7</Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment> > > > instead of > > <Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment>J2SE-1.7</Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment> > > > I tested the CAS Editor, all seemed to work just fine. > > (For those that are interested: I found the problem by using the osgi console > and manually starting the plugins that have been marked as INSTALLED. It said > that the execution environment was not fulfilled. After checking the > installation log for the used java version and all, I searched for the > supported environments: http://wiki.osgi.org/wiki/Execution_Environment) > > There are also some plugins that do not specify > Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment and do not exlude the > Import-Package/org.osgi.framework, e.g., uimaj-ep-jcasgen. I think we should > enforce the java version for all plugins. > > Best, > > Peter > > Am 16.01.2015 um 23:54 schrieb Peter Klügl: >> I'll take a look (tomorrow). >> >> Best, >> >> Peter >> >> Am 16.01.2015 um 23:50 schrieb Marshall Schor: >>> I looked up this in the previous Ruta release, and it's the same there. >>> >>> I tried installing the 2.7.0 plugins on Kepler, and was able to reproduce >>> this >>> issue. >>> >>> I may have found a fix. But I'd like someone who knows the CAS Editor to >>> check >>> if it's all working (I was able to run it a bit, so I think it is...). >>> >>> The fix has 2 parts. >>> >>> 1) Modify the POMs for the 2 Cas Editor Projects (uimaj-ep-cas-editor, and >>> uimaj-ep-cas-editor-ide) and add this line to the <Import-Package> element >>> at >>> the end of the other **negated** elements, following the >>> !org.eclipse.core.runtime, >>> !org.osgi.framework, <!-- newly added negated element to block >>> this >>> import --> >>> >>> After I did that the plugins would resolve in the update site, but wouldn't >>> run >>> in Kepler. This is because the plugins had specified >>> Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment of J2SE-1.7. To get this to work, I >>> had to >>> comment out the statement for Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment - I did >>> it in >>> all the plugins (about 1/2) that had it. >>> >>> <!-- >>> Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment>J2SE-1.7</Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment--> >>> >>> >>> Once I did that, and rebuilt all the plugins, and rebuilt the update site, >>> and >>> started with a brand-new, unzipped version of Kepler, I was able to install >>> OK, >>> and run OK. >>> >>> ************It would be great if someone could confirm this works for >>> them...************* >>> >>> I plan to check this in maybe later this evening... >>> >>> -Marshall >>> >>> On 1/16/2015 11:01 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>> - compared source-release and svn-tag - OK >>>> - del .m2/**/uima, mvn clean install svn-tag - OK >>>> - del .m2/**/uima, mvn clean install source-release - OK >>>> - del .m2/**/uima, mvn clean install ruta 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT with staged >>>> uimaj 2.7.0 - OK >>>> - installed updatesite in Kepler (4.3sr1) - FAILED >>>> >>>> Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could not >>>> be found. >>>> Software being installed: UIMA Tools (includes Runtime) 2.7.0 >>>> (org.apache.uima.tools.feature.group 2.7.0) >>>> Missing requirement: Apache UIMA Eclipse: uimaj-ep-cas-editor 2.7.0 >>>> (org.apache.uima.caseditor 2.7.0) requires 'package org.osgi.framework >>>> [1.8.0,2.0.0)' but it could not be found >>>> Cannot satisfy dependency: >>>> From: UIMA Tools (includes Runtime) 2.7.0 >>>> (org.apache.uima.tools.feature.group 2.7.0) >>>> To: org.apache.uima.caseditor [2.7.0] >>>> I think we observed this problem before when a user was not able to >>>> install the UIMA Ruta Workbench because of the UIMA plugins. >>>> >>>> Should we really drop support for Kepler? >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> Am 15.01.2015 um 00:00 schrieb Marshall Schor: >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> The next RC of core Java UIMA framework, RC4, is ready for testing. >>>>> RC 3 had a multi-threading problem and never got posted... RC 4 fixed that >>>>> and >>>>> improved performance in a couple of areas. >>>>> >>>>> Verses 2.6.0, this version has lots of changes. These are summarized in >>>>> the >>>>> README and RELEASE_NOTES. The list of changes in Jira: >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.7.0SDK%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uimaj-2.7.0-rc4 >>>>> >>>>> The Maven artifacts are here: >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1044/ >>>>> >>>>> The SVN tags are here: >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.7.0/ >>>>> >>>>> and for the Eclipse Update Site: >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-eclipse-update-site-2.7.0/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how to >>>>> test >>>>> release candidates. >>>>> >>>>> Please vote on release: >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release >>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care >>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ... >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> -Marshall >>>>> >>>> >> > > >
