On 06/24/2015 09:12 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
[...]
Just for the sake of knowing where this is going, assuming the UIMA core API
as a baseline and the uimaFIT API as an improvement, how would this further
improvement look like?
Or would the issue be solvable by integrating uimaFIT into the core (e.g. to
avoid re-approval of libraries by company legal departments)?
I am just speaking for myself here, but I don't want more framework, I
want less. I don't want to have to use uimaFIT to help me deal with UIMA
if I could have something that doesn't require that help. Give me a
simple JSON based data format and I'll be happy.
I know this is selfish, but unless the discussion is seriously moving in
that direction, I'm simply not interested :)
--Thilo
Cheers,
-- Richard
