- Build from sources ZIP with Java 7 with clean repo: OK
- Spot-checking of signatures: OK
- online issue list: OK
- offline issues file: OK
  - ${project.version} problem still exists
- spot check release notes: OK
  - btw, where are the perl, Python and TCL bindings - are these part of UIMA 
C++?
- spot check licenses: OK
- build some code against the RC artifacts fetched from the staging repo: OK

So far so good, but what are these files in the source ZIP?

    1361  Defl:N      741  46% 07-28-2015 11:29 84cbf9c6  
uimaj-2.8.1/uimaj-cpe/checkpoint.dat
    1368  Defl:N      748  45% 07-28-2015 11:29 ac818f62  
uimaj-2.8.1/uimaj-cpe/checkpoint.dat.prev
       0  Defl:N        2   0% 07-28-2015 11:29 00000000  
uimaj-2.8.1/uimaj-cpe/checkpoint_synchPoint.xml
       0  Defl:N        2   0% 07-28-2015 11:29 00000000  
uimaj-2.8.1/uimaj-cpe/checkpoint_synchPoint.xml.prev

Cheers,

-- Richard

On 28.07.2015, at 19:21, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've posted the UIMAJ SDK 2.8.1 rc1 release candidate.  
> 
> This version has mainly bug fixes for issues found as 2.8.0 got a bit wider 
> use.
> 
> The list of changes in Jira: 
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%202.8.1SDK%20AND%20project%20%3D%20UIMA
> 
> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uimaj-2.8.1-rc1/
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uimaj-2.8.1-rc1/>
> 
> The Maven artifacts are here: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1067
> 
> The SVN tags are here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.8.1/
> 
> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uimaj-2.8.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uimaj-2.8.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/>
> 
> See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how to test
> release candidates.
> 
> Please vote on release:
> 
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0   Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -Marshall
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to