- Build from sources ZIP with Java 7 with clean repo: OK
- Spot-checking of signatures: OK
- online issue list: OK
- offline issues file: OK
- ${project.version} problem still exists
- spot check release notes: OK
- btw, where are the perl, Python and TCL bindings - are these part of UIMA
C++?
- spot check licenses: OK
- build some code against the RC artifacts fetched from the staging repo: OK
So far so good, but what are these files in the source ZIP?
1361 Defl:N 741 46% 07-28-2015 11:29 84cbf9c6
uimaj-2.8.1/uimaj-cpe/checkpoint.dat
1368 Defl:N 748 45% 07-28-2015 11:29 ac818f62
uimaj-2.8.1/uimaj-cpe/checkpoint.dat.prev
0 Defl:N 2 0% 07-28-2015 11:29 00000000
uimaj-2.8.1/uimaj-cpe/checkpoint_synchPoint.xml
0 Defl:N 2 0% 07-28-2015 11:29 00000000
uimaj-2.8.1/uimaj-cpe/checkpoint_synchPoint.xml.prev
Cheers,
-- Richard
On 28.07.2015, at 19:21, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've posted the UIMAJ SDK 2.8.1 rc1 release candidate.
>
> This version has mainly bug fixes for issues found as 2.8.0 got a bit wider
> use.
>
> The list of changes in Jira:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%202.8.1SDK%20AND%20project%20%3D%20UIMA
>
> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uimaj-2.8.1-rc1/
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uimaj-2.8.1-rc1/>
>
> The Maven artifacts are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1067
>
> The SVN tags are here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.8.1/
>
> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uimaj-2.8.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uimaj-2.8.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/>
>
> See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how to test
> release candidates.
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
>
>