[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15071036#comment-15071036
 ] 

Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-3562:
--------------------------------------------------

I believe replacing a "throws X" with a "throws A, B" where A and B are 
subclasses of X is a backwards compatible change, at least if X is a checked 
exception. But semver doesn't seem to agree with me here.

> Avoid throwing UIMAException
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-3562
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3562
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: uimaFIT
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0uimaFIT
>            Reporter: Richard Eckart de Castilho
>            Assignee: Richard Eckart de Castilho
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.3.0uimaFIT
>
>
> uimaFIT throws a UIMAException in several places, apparently to avoid 
> separate throws clauses for AnalysisEngineException, 
> ResourceInitializationException and the likes. This is not good, because the 
> different kinds of problems that can occur are somewhat hidden from a person 
> using methods throwing UIMAException. It would be better to declare each 
> exception separately.
> Examples:
> * CpePipeline.runPipeline
> * SimplePipeline.runPipeline
> * JCasFactory.createJCas



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to