[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15507180#comment-15507180
 ] 

Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-5115:
--------------------------------------------------

So what you are suggesting is e.g.

*New variant*
{code}
jcas.select().type(Token.class).at(sentence).covered() // or
jcas.select().type(Token.class).covered().at(sentence)
{code}

instead of 

*Old variant*
{code}
jcas.select().type(Token.class).coveredBy(sentence)
{code}

I am not very convinced... I think splitting the API up in this rather atomic 
way makes it less intuitive/readable.

> uv3 select() api for iterators and streams over CAS contents
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-5115
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5115
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Core Java Framework
>            Reporter: Marshall Schor
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0.0SDKexp
>
>
> Design and implement a select() API based on uimaFIT's select, integrated 
> well with Java 8 concepts.  Initial discussions in UIMA-1524.  Wiki with 
> diagram: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/UIMA/UV3+Iterator+support



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to