> Downloaded uima-ducc-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uima-ducc/2.2.1/RC2/uima-ducc-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz>
: OK
> Installed and started Apache DUCC demo
http://uima-ducc-demo.apache.org:42133/jobs.jsp :
   - Jobs, Services, Reservations running : OK
   - WS
      - Jobs + Details: OK
      - Reservations + Details : OK
      - Services + Details : OK
      - System Administration, Broker, Classes, Daemons, Machines : OK
      * System DuccBook : MISSING!
      - System Viz : OK
> Spot check LICENSE file : OK
   - note typo:
      (webserver>navigation
   - not inconsistency:
      (Webserver) vs. (webserver)
> Check README file : OK
   - should it also say JAVA_HOME should be set to Java 7 install location
for mvn building?
> Spot check NOTICE file: OK
> Check ReleaseNotes.html : OK, except
   - could not easily find: *ducc_update* script which can be copied from
the UIMA Downloads page
<http://uima.apache.org/downloads.cgi#Latest%20Official%20Releases>
      (maybe it's just me - has to resort to searching the page for
"ducc_update").

Vote on RC2: -1

Lou.
<http://uima.apache.org/downloads.cgi#Latest%20Official%20Releases>




On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <cwik...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> the UIMA-DUCC 2.2.1 release candidate 2 is ready for voting.
>
> Fixed the following issues found in RC1:
>
> - DUCC now fails to handle fake ids when running a simulated cluster
> - DUCC Web Server (WS) NPE handling JobSpecificationData requests
>
> The list of changes in Jira:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%
> 20%3D%202.2.1-Ducc%20AND%20project%20%3D%20UIMA
>
> The source and binary zip/tars are staged to
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uima-ducc/2.2.1/RC2/
>
> The Maven artifacts are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1148
>
> The SVN tags are here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uima-ducc/tags/uima-ducc-2.2.1/
>
> See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how to
> test release candidates.
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0   Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks
> - Jerry Cwiklik
>

Reply via email to