[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marshall Schor updated UIMA-5547:
---------------------------------
    Description: 
The cas complete deserialization done by a test case in UIMA V3 had a strange 
failure caused by some caching that wasn't cleared (and was holding on to 
previously created 0-length primitive arrays shared by the JCas).

Check all the CAS deserialization paths to insure that non-delta ones do a cas 
reset - to clear out possibly cached things.  And check if extra reset is 
needed when (re)installing type system, indexes, etc. - some is done in v3, not 
sure about v2..

  was:
The cas complete deserialization done by a test case in UIMA V3 had a strange 
failure caused by some caching that wasn't cleared (and was holding on to 
previously created 0-length primitive arrays shared by the JCas).

Check all the CAS deserialization paths to insure that non-delta ones do a cas 
reset - to clear out possibly cached things.  And check if extra reset is 
needed when installing type system, indexes, etc. - some is done in v3, not 
sure about v2..


> some CAS deserializations skipping CAS Reset
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-5547
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5547
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Java Framework
>            Reporter: Marshall Schor
>            Assignee: Marshall Schor
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0.0SDK-beta
>
>
> The cas complete deserialization done by a test case in UIMA V3 had a strange 
> failure caused by some caching that wasn't cleared (and was holding on to 
> previously created 0-length primitive arrays shared by the JCas).
> Check all the CAS deserialization paths to insure that non-delta ones do a 
> cas reset - to clear out possibly cached things.  And check if extra reset is 
> needed when (re)installing type system, indexes, etc. - some is done in v3, 
> not sure about v2..



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to