[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16292909#comment-16292909
 ] 

Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-5662:
--------------------------------------------------

If I understand it correctly, that sounds like a pretty good compromise. 

Is it really worth going for a ThreadLocal to avoid API changes? I mean, there 
may be good reasons for using a ThreadLocal (e.g. different behavior for the 
ID-FS mapping when a CAS is concurrently accessed from different threads) - but 
my feeling using a ThreadLocal to avoid API changes maybe is a bit too 
conservative. APIs should be able to evolve.

> uv3 support CAS deserialization subsequent low level access
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-5662
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5662
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core Java Framework
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0SDK-beta
>            Reporter: Marshall Schor
>            Assignee: Marshall Schor
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0.0SDK
>
>
> Some users depend 1) constant v2-ids for FSs preserved in deserialization and 
> serialization, and 2) low level cas API access to these.
> V3 normally doesn't maintain tables linking ids to FSs, as these (unless weak 
> refs are used) prevent GC of unreachable FSs.
> Based on a mode, set by -Duima.deserialize_perserve_ids, and also 
> controllable by new config option per deserialize call, alter the 
> deserialization for those deserializers which know about v2 ids, to put these 
> into the map used for low-level CAS access, using the actual v2 ids, and 
> change the v3 next available id for future new FSs to be 1 beyond the end.
> The -Duima.deserialize-preserve_ids global setting is needed to handle the 
> use case of some annotators using low-level APIs, when part of a pipeline is 
> "remoted". 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to