[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jerry Cwiklik updated UIMA-5697:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
The RunRemoteAsyncAE should change to support targeting of specific service 
instance. The code already accepts a command line option for targeting but the 
UIMA-AS client is not using it 
If -TargetServiceId is provided, the client should use synchronous 
sendAndReceive(cas,List<>,serviceTargetId) API instead of asynchronous send().
Modifiy comments to include description of TargetServiceId option. Also modify 
usage test to include targeting option.

  was:
The RunRemoteAsyncAE should change to support targeting of specific service 
instance. The code already accepts a command line option for targeting but the 
UIMA-AS client is not using it 
If -TargetServiceId is provided, the client should use synchronous 
sendAndReceive(cas,List<>,serviceTargetId) API instead of asynchronous send().
Modified comments to include description of TargetServiceId option. Also modify 
usage test to include targeting option.


> UIMA-AS: modifiy RunRemoteAsyncAE to support service targeting
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-5697
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5697
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Async Scaleout
>            Reporter: Jerry Cwiklik
>            Assignee: Jerry Cwiklik
>             Fix For: 2.10.2AS
>
>
> The RunRemoteAsyncAE should change to support targeting of specific service 
> instance. The code already accepts a command line option for targeting but 
> the UIMA-AS client is not using it 
> If -TargetServiceId is provided, the client should use synchronous 
> sendAndReceive(cas,List<>,serviceTargetId) API instead of asynchronous send().
> Modifiy comments to include description of TargetServiceId option. Also 
> modify usage test to include targeting option.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to